Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pooch and the Pauper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 01:01, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Pooch and the Pauper[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing was found in a WP:BEFORE except film database sites, videos, and promo material.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.--Filmomusico (talk) 21:59, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States-related deletion discussions.--Filmomusico (talk) 21:59, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Pass WP:NFO. This is a Disney original made-for-TV film nationally televised on ABC and Disney Channel. This was also reviewed by, at least, one professional critic in a WP:RS. SirEd ^Dimmi!!! 02:23, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @SirEdimon:Maybe. But one semi-reliable source doesn't make an article worth of inclusion. I was looking more for The Hollywood Reporter or Variety at least, but found none. Other articles have more sources than that.--Filmomusico (talk) 03:36, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 August 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:18, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, it is a notable film and I agree with the points above Sahaib (talk) 19:33, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I was able to find a review in The Washington Post in a ProQuest search (apologies for having no url to share as it's through my university library). See "Dog Days and Hot Cuban Music: Plus a Delayed Series Debut and a David Attenborough Quest" 16 July 2000, page MC3. With two reviews in respected national publications the subject marginally passes WP:NFO.4meter4 (talk) 15:23, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.